<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>GeoGeek Field Notes</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/</link><description>Research notes on GIS, remote sensing, GeoAI, visualization, and geographic observation.</description><language>en</language><item><title>The Limits of AI: Geospatial Foundation Models Do Not Understand Geography</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/limits-of-ai-geospatial-foundation-models/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/limits-of-ai-geospatial-foundation-models/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>Geospatial foundation models can learn powerful spatial representations. Their harder test is geographic reasoning: scale, spatial dependence, regional heterogeneity, mechanism, and transfer beyond familiar places.</description></item><item><title>A Model of Good Practice for Machine Learning in Remote Sensing</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/machine-learning-remote-sensing-good-practice/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/machine-learning-remote-sensing-good-practice/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>The hard part is not fitting a model. It is proving that what the model learned survives sparse samples, spatial heterogeneity, weak signals, and geographic transfer.</description></item><item><title>nature-reviewer-skills: 450 Recurring Critique Patterns from 23,000 Nature Review Comments</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/nature-reviewer-skills-450-critique-patterns/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/nature-reviewer-skills-450-critique-patterns/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>A review-assistance system built from public peer-review files: not a substitute for judgment, but a structured catalogue of the questions reviewers repeatedly ask.</description></item><item><title>Distilling Nature Reviewers in Earth-System Science</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/distilling-nature-reviewers-earth-system-science/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/distilling-nature-reviewers-earth-system-science/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>A domain-specific extension of reviewer-pattern mining across atmosphere, hydrology, ecology, and remote sensing.</description></item><item><title>Distilling a Nature Remote-Sensing Reviewer</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/nature-remote-sensing-reviewer-skill/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/nature-remote-sensing-reviewer-skill/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>A lightweight reviewer skill assembled from public review files, focused on the points where remote-sensing papers most often lose credibility.</description></item><item><title>Opening the AlphaEarth Black Box: Physical Semantics in the Embedding</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/alphaearth-physical-semantics/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/alphaearth-physical-semantics/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>A new study asks whether AlphaEarth’s latent dimensions correspond to interpretable land-surface properties rather than merely useful predictive features.</description></item><item><title>Writing Causal Claims Without Overreach</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/writing-causal-claims-ecology/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/writing-causal-claims-ecology/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>Causal language is earned by a question, a defensible causal structure, an identification strategy, and sensitivity analysis—not by significance alone.</description></item><item><title>Greener Is Not Necessarily More Productive</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/greenness-is-not-productivity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/greenness-is-not-productivity/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>Greenness, vegetation cover, and productivity often move together—but global evidence shows that they diverge across large parts of the vegetated world.</description></item><item><title>Chl-a Is Not Biomass: When the Proxy Reverses</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/chlorophyll-is-not-biomass/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/chlorophyll-is-not-biomass/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>Chlorophyll-a and phytoplankton biomass can decouple, vary for different physiological reasons, and in some regions even move in opposite directions.</description></item><item><title>Global Cropland Dynamics, 2015–2024</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/global-cropland-dynamics-2015-2024/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/global-cropland-dynamics-2015-2024/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>A new Landsat-based annual cropland dataset shows where farmland expanded, where it contracted, and how trade, conflict, drought, and land conversion left different regional signatures.</description></item><item><title>What Remote Sensing Sees—and What It Does Not: The Proxy-of-a-Proxy Problem</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/proxy-of-a-proxy-remote-sensing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/proxy-of-a-proxy-remote-sensing/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>High retrieval accuracy does not guarantee a valid environmental conclusion. Remote sensing often estimates a measurable variable first and interprets the target object only through a second proxy relation.</description></item><item><title>Qiusheng Wu and the Open-Source Route into Geospatial Computing</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/qiusheng-wu-open-source-geospatial-learning/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/qiusheng-wu-open-source-geospatial-learning/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>A personal note on the educator whose open-source teaching made GIS and remote sensing feel learnable by building, not by memorising software menus.</description></item><item><title>Retrieving Chl-a Is Not Retrieving Phytoplankton Biomass</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/chl-a-retrieval-versus-biomass/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/chl-a-retrieval-versus-biomass/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>The satellite product may be chlorophyll-a; the paper may discuss biomass. The missing step between them is an ecological representation relation, not part of the retrieval itself.</description></item><item><title>Some Trends Are Artifacts of Ignored Autocorrelation</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/autocorrelation-and-false-trends/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/autocorrelation-and-false-trends/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>Long time series contain memory. If that dependence is ignored, apparent accelerations, breakpoints, and regime shifts can look more certain than the evidence allows.</description></item><item><title>Can Satellites and AI Reveal “Maxwell Equations” for the Earth System?</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/earth-system-maxwell-equations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/earth-system-maxwell-equations/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>A Wuhan University perspective proposes a planetary laboratory in which global satellite observations and AI are used to search for compact, interpretable laws of Earth-system behaviour.</description></item><item><title>Long Remote-Sensing Records and the Problem of Temporal Consistency</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/temporal-consistency-long-remote-sensing-records/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/temporal-consistency-long-remote-sensing-records/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>A decades-long satellite series is rarely one instrument watching continuously. Sensor changes, orbit drift, calibration, fusion, and processing can create trends that look environmental.</description></item><item><title>When Nature Disagrees with Nature: The Observation Problem in Remote Sensing</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/when-nature-disagrees-remote-sensing-observation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/when-nature-disagrees-remote-sensing-observation/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>Two apparently conflicting studies of Amazon seasonality expose two different failures of remote sensing: seeing a signal created by geometry, and failing to sample enough of the phenomenon.</description></item><item><title>Causal Shapley Is Not Causal Identification</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/causal-shapley-is-not-causal-identification/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/causal-shapley-is-not-causal-identification/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>Adding a causal graph to Shapley attribution can change the decomposition, but it does not by itself identify a causal effect from observational data.</description></item><item><title>Three Boundaries of SHAP: Attribution, Mechanism, and Causal Identification</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/three-boundaries-of-shap-in-nature-papers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/three-boundaries-of-shap-in-nature-papers/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>Three Nature-family papers show that Shapley values can play very different epistemic roles depending on the surrounding evidence.</description></item><item><title>SHAP’s Interpretive Boundary: From Model Attribution to Causal Identification</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/shap-interpretation-boundaries/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/shap-interpretation-boundaries/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>The question is not whether SHAP is “misused” in the abstract, but which class of claim the evidence actually supports.</description></item><item><title>Extrapolation Risk in Global-Scale Studies</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/extrapolation-risk-global-scale-studies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/extrapolation-risk-global-scale-studies/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>A global map can look continuous while its evidence remains local. Three questions matter: the input data, the validation design, and the boundary of extrapolation.</description></item><item><title>Reassessing Global Tree-Restoration Potential After a Wave of Critiques</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/reassessing-global-tree-restoration-potential/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/reassessing-global-tree-restoration-potential/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>The influential 2019 Science estimate of global restoration potential became a case study in how basemaps, validation, and extrapolation shape policy-scale numbers.</description></item><item><title>Stress-Testing AlphaEarth in Agriculture</title><link>https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/alphaearth-agriculture-benchmark/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://geogeeklab.github.io/field-notes/alphaearth-agriculture-benchmark/</guid><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><description>AlphaEarth is competitive under local training, but its advantage weakens as agricultural tasks demand cross-region transfer, fine temporal sensitivity, and physical interpretation.</description></item></channel></rss>
